DP Creations et al v. Ortiz et al
Plaintiff: DP Creations, Denise Pratt and Nevin Pratt
Defendant: Jackie Ortiz and Stephanie Ortiz
Case Number: 2:2019cv00948
Filed: November 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Referring Judge: Dustin B Pead
2 Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2020 Filing 25 First Amended ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against DP Creations, Denise Pratt, Nevin Pratt filed by Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz.(Erickson, Michael)
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within twenty-one (21) days after any defendant has been served or any defendant has appeared, unless any party is appearing pro se. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/15/2020. (las)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 1/14/2020. (las)
January 9, 2020 Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Counter Claimants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz, Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. (Erickson, Michael)
January 3, 2020 Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by Stephanie Ortiz, Jackie Ortiz.(Erickson, Michael)
December 31, 2019 Filing 20 The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment forms has now passed. One or more of the parties did not file, therefore the case is no longer eligible for magistrate assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to the case. (nl)
December 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #9 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel. Replies due by 1/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/24/2019. (nl)
December 24, 2019 Filing 18 OBJECTIONS to #17 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion, filed by DP Creations, Denise Pratt, Nevin Pratt. (Hansen, F.)
December 23, 2019 Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A - Ortiz Declaration, #2 Affidavit Exhibit B - Erickson Declaration)(Erickson, Michael)
December 23, 2019 Filing 16 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time)(Erickson, Michael)
December 23, 2019 Filing 15 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying #10 Motion to Stay ; Answer deadline updated for Jackie Ortiz answer due 1/3/2020; Stephanie Ortiz answer due 1/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/20/2019. (nl)
December 19, 2019 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Plaintiffs DP Creations, Denise Pratt, Nevin Pratt. (Hansen, F.)
December 13, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE REMINDER - All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the #4 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment,, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party's response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.# Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (nl)
December 12, 2019 Filing 12 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. (nl)
December 9, 2019 Filing 11 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Plaintiffs DP Creations, Denise Pratt, Nevin Pratt. (Hansen, F.)
December 6, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Stay Proceedings)(Erickson, Michael)
December 6, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. (Erickson, Michael)
December 4, 2019 Filing 8 CLERKS ORDER of Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint re #2 Notice of Removal, signed by Anne W. Morgan, Chief Deputy Clerk, Answer deadline updated for Jackie Ortiz answer due 12/6/2019; Stephanie Ortiz answer due 12/6/2019. (nl)
December 3, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Extension)(Erickson, Michael) Modified on 12/4/2019 to correct event, Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (nl).
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/02/2019. (nl)
December 2, 2019 Filing 5 File Received from 3rd District, Salt Lake County consisting of Docket and filings from state court. (Attachments: #1 State Complaint, #2 Summons Returned S. Ortiz, #3 Proof of Service re Motion S Ortiz, #4 Proof of Service re Motion J Ortiz, #5 Amended Complaint, #6 Notice of Appearance, #7 Motion for Extension of Time, #8 Mtn for Extension of Time Proposed Order, #9 Order Granting Mtn for Ext of Time, #10 State Notice of Removal) (nl)
November 27, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs DP Creations, Denise Pratt, Nevin Pratt, Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. Form due by 12/12/2019. (tlh)
November 27, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs DP Creations, Denise Pratt, Nevin Pratt and Defendants Jackie Ortiz, Stephanie Ortiz. (tlh)
November 27, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Third Judicial District of Salt Lake County, case number 190907961, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3430297) filed by Stephanie Ortiz, Jackie Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Proofs of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Order Granting Extension, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Removal (State Court), #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (Erickson, Michael)
November 27, 2019 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Defendants Jackie Ortiz and Stephanie Ortiz are directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (tlh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DP Creations et al v. Ortiz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DP Creations
Represented By: F. Mark Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Pratt
Represented By: F. Mark Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nevin Pratt
Represented By: F. Mark Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackie Ortiz
Represented By: Michael K. Erickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephanie Ortiz
Represented By: Michael K. Erickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?