Reilly v. Vivint Solar
| James Reilly |
| Vivint Solar |
| Shalis M. Larsen |
| 2:2019mc00166 |
| March 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena and Memorandum in Support filed by Petitioner Shalis M. Larsen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A: Subpoena for Video Deposition Directed to Shalis M. Larsen, #3 Exhibit B: Declaration of Shalis M. Larsen, #4 Exhibit C: Littlejohn v. Solar, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Kaye, Anthony) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/12/2019: #6 USDC District of NJ Docket Sheet) (nl). |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Clark Waddoups. Petitioner Shalis M. Larsen is directed to E-File the Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee (found under Other Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 47.00 by the end of the business day. Once the filing fee event is completed the initiating document (Motion to Quash and cover sheet ) may be E-filed.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nl) |
| Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee for Motion to Quash received from Petitioner Shalis M. Larsen. (Filing fee $ 47, receipt number 1088-3224361). (Kaye, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
