Ultradent Products, Inc. v. CSFG Colorado Springs Freestyle & Greco et al
Ultradent Products, Inc. |
CSFG Colorado Springs Freestyle & Greco and Brandon Lucero |
2:2020cv00025 |
January 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Evelyn J Furse |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Elliott J. Williams for Ultradent Products, Inc. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 1/29/2020. (nl) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Elliott J. Williams , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3473538, filed by Plaintiff Ultradent Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit B - Electronic Case Filing Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Black, Kenneth) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Elliott J. Williams, for Plaintiff Ultradent Products, Inc. (tlh) |
Filing 7 Report on the Filing of a Patent action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (tlh) |
Filing 6 Report on the Filing of a Trademark action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (tlh) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 1/15/2020. (nl) |
Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Brandon Lucero. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (rks) |
Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to CSFG Colorado Springs Freestyle & Greco. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (rks) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3462861) filed by Ultradent Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - OPALESCENCE Registrations, #2 Exhibit B - Bumped Syringe Registration, #3 Exhibit C - USD838583, #4 Exhibit D - OPALESCENCE Reference Guide, #5 Exhibit E - Screenshots of Amazon Storefront, #6 Exhibit F - Jante Jalbert CPA, #7 Exhibit G - CSFG Sponsors) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse (Black, Kenneth) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. Plaintiff Ultradent Products, Inc. is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.