Barney v. Unified Police Department Adult Detention Center
| Jeremy Bryan Barney and Jeremy Bryan Barney Randall |
| Unified Police Department Adult Detention Center |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 2:2020cv00083 |
| February 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Unified Police Department Adult Detention Center (Originally received by the court on 02/10/2020). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Jeremy Bryan Barney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish (tlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/6/2020: #2 Re-Scanned for image quality) (dtp). |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: TBD. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file with the Court a certified copy of his inmate trust account statements. Collection of Fees Sent: No Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 02/19/2020. (tlh)
|
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 02/07/2020) filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Bryan Barney. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
