Gibbs v. Denver Post
| Aaron Gibbs |
| Denver Post |
| 2:2020cv00348 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Ted Stewart |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 THIS CASE HAS BEEN CLOSED pursuant to order of consolidation. All docketing will be in the lead case 2:18-cv-00905-TS-CMR. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to the case.NO FURTHER DOCKETING ON THIS CASE. (jds) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION - The court hereby ORDERS that pursuant to DUCivR 42-1, Case No. 2:18-cv-905-TS-CMR is hereby consolidated with Case No. 2:20-cv-00348-TS-CMR for all purposes. Future filings in these two consolidated cases shall be in Case No. 2:18-cv-905-TS-CMR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 6/23/2020. (jds)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 6/12/2020. (tlc)
|
| Filing 5 Remark - Copies of the notice and #4 Order Reassigning Case notice were not mailed to non-email recipients due to the temporary closure of the United States Courthouse under COVID-19 restrictions. Copies will be mailed via USPS after the courthouse reopens on June 15, 2020. (jwt) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, Gibbs v. Denver Post, Case No. 2:20-cv-00348-JCB, be transferred for all further proceedings to District Judge Ted Stewart, who is presiding over Gibbs v. Gill, Case No. 2:18-cv-00905-TS-CMR. Case reassigned to Judge Ted Stewart for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 6/11/20. (jwt)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Denver Post (Originally received by the court on 06/04/2020). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Aaron Gibbs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #4 Envelope 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (jl) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 06/11/2020. (jl)
|
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared Bennett for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 06/04/2020) filed by Plaintiff Aaron Gibbs. (kn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gibbs v. Denver Post | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aaron Gibbs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Denver Post | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
