Hafen v. Dearden et al
| Jonathan O. Hafen |
| Eric Dearden, Sandy Dearden, Kliff Bare, Dolores Batalla, Dearden & Associates and Daniel Dearden |
| 2:2020cv00373 |
| June 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Tena Campbell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Kliff Bare - answer due 10/15/2020. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 8/17/20 (alt)
|
| Filing 18 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Jonathan O. Hafen. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Burge, Rodger) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 8/4/20 (alt)
|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Daniel Dearden, Eric Dearden, Sandy Dearden, Dearden & Associates.(Anderson, Brett) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Attorney Brett C. Anderson withdrawn from case for Kliff Bare, Dolores Batalla as they filed an appearance for them in error so they have no information as to the parties. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/23/20 (alt)
|
| Filing 14 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #13 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Defendants Kliff Bare, Dolores Batalla. (Anderson, Brett) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Defendants Kliff Bare, Dolores Batalla. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Brett) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadlines updated for: Kliff Bare answer due 7/27/2020; Dolores Batalla answer due 7/27/2020; Daniel Dearden answer due 7/27/2020; Eric Dearden answer due 7/27/2020; Sandy Dearden answer due 7/27/2020; Dearden & Associates answer due 7/27/2020. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/20/20 (alt)
|
| Filing 11 REQUEST to Submit for Decision filed by Defendants Kliff Bare, Dolores Batalla, Daniel Dearden, Eric Dearden, Sandy Dearden, Dearden & Associates. (Anderson, Brett) |
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendants Kliff Bare, Dolores Batalla, Daniel Dearden, Eric Dearden, Sandy Dearden, Dearden & Associates. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Extension of Time to File Answer)(Anderson, Brett) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett C. Anderson on behalf of Kliff Bare, Dolores Batalla, Daniel Dearden, Eric Dearden, Sandy Dearden, Dearden & Associates (Anderson, Brett) Modified on 7/23/2020: filer selected parties incorrectly (alt) |
| Filing 8 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Dolores Batalla. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (kn) |
| Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Sandy Dearden. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Kliff Bare. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Eric Dearden. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Dearden & Associates. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Daniel Dearden. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AUTDC-3611866) filed by Jonathan O. Hafen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet for Dearden Complaint) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (Burge, Rodger) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Plaintiff Jonathan O. Hafen is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (jl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
