Hale v. MTR Express et al
| Jen Hale and Seth Hale |
| MTR Express and Vladimir Zhukov |
| 2:2020cv00439 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 9/4/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 9/4/2020. Expert Discovery due by 7/9/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 8/9/2021. 3-day Jury Trial is set for 3/14/2022 at 08:30 AM in Rm 3.400 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/11/2020. (eat)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Stipulated Motion to Substitute Party. Seth Hale added. Jen Hale (on behalf of S.H., a minor) terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/11/2020. (eat)
|
| Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION for Initial Scheduling Conference Report filed by Plaintiff Jen Hale. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order) Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Allred, Parker) |
| Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION to Substitute Party filed by Plaintiff Jen Hale. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order for Substitution of Party) Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Allred, Parker) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Colby B. Vogt on behalf of Jen Hale (Vogt, Colby) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Parker A. Allred on behalf of Jen Hale (Allred, Parker) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to Defendants in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 6/26/2020. (eat)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Jen Hale, Defendants MTR Express, Vladimir Zhukov. (kn) |
| Filing 5 File uploaded from XchangeWEB for the 3rd District Court for Tooele County, case number 200300764, consisting of all documents filed in State Court. (Attachments: #1 State Complaint, #2 Acceptance of Service, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal) (eat) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 6/25/2020. (eat)
|
| Filing 3 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) with Jury Demand filed by MTR Express, Vladimir Zhukov. (Trayner, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Third District Court, Tooele County, case number 200300764, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AUTDC-3624287) filed by MTR Express, Vladimir Zhukov. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball (Trayner, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball. Defendants MTR Express, Vladimir Zhukov is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (kn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
