Claunch v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
| Kevin D. Claunch |
| United States Government and United States Department of Veterans Affairs |
| 2:2020cv00513 |
| July 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Contract: Recovery Veteran Ben. |
| 38 U.S.C. ยง 2011 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 9/14/2020. (lnp)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against United States Department of Veterans Affairs, United States Government (Originally received by the court on 07/17/2020). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Kevin D. Claunch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (jl) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 08/20/2020. (jl)
|
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 07/17/2020) filed by Plaintiff Kevin D. Claunch. (jl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
