Collram v. 6G Management Services
Plaintiff: Grant Collram
Defendant: 6G Management Services
Case Number: 2:2020cv00530
Filed: July 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: David Barlow
Referring Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/21/20. (jrj)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 9/18/2020. (atk)
September 17, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine B. Benson on behalf of 6G Management Services (Benson, Katherine)
September 17, 2020 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint filed by 6G Management Services. Attorney Scott A. Hagen added to party 6G Management Services(pty:dft)(Hagen, Scott)
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David I. Moulton for Grant Collram.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 08/07/2020. (kpf)
August 6, 2020 Filing 9 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to 6G Management Services. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (kn)
August 5, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of David I. Moulton , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-3672989,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Grant Collram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Pro Hac Vice Application, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Benjamin, M.)
July 28, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Andrew W. Dunlap, for Plaintiff Grant Collram (jl)
July 28, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Michael A. Josephson, for Plaintiff Grant Collram (jl)
July 28, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney David I. Moulton, for Plaintiff Grant Collram (jl)
July 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Richard J. (Rex) Burch, for Plaintiff Grant Collram (jl)
July 28, 2020 Filing 3 Modification of Docket: Error: Complaint was emailed to the court on 7/27/2020, but the filing was not done until 7/28/2020. Correction: changed filed date on the case to 7/28/2020 re #2 Complaint. (jl)
July 28, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against 6G Management Services (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4681091157) filed by Grant Collram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Collram Grant Notice of Filing Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Barlow (Benjamin, M.)
July 27, 2020 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Barlow. Plaintiff Grant Collram is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (jl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collram v. 6G Management Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grant Collram
Represented By: M. Paige Benjamin
Represented By: David I. Moulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 6G Management Services
Represented By: Scott A. Hagen
Represented By: Katherine B. Benson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?