Price v. Nike
Douglas Price |
Nike |
2:2020cv00568 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Howard C Nielson |
Daphne A Oberg |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER to File Signed Amended Complaint. Mr. Price must file a signed version of his amended complaint, including all exhibits, by October 15, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 10/1/2020. (lnp) |
Filing 10 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Amended Complaint and Exhibits. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Envelope)(lnp) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Amend #3 Complaint; denying #8 Motion to Seal #3 Complaint. Mr. Price is ORDERED to file the amended complaint by September 29, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/15/2020. (lnp) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Seal Document #3 Complaint filed by Plaintiff Douglas Price. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(lnp) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Amend #3 Complaint filed by Plaintiff Douglas Price. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(lnp) |
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 8/10/2020. (lnp) |
Filing 5 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Electronic Noticing Registration Form. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (jl) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Service of Process. Summons to be served on: All defendants filed by Plaintiff Douglas Price. (jl) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Nike (Originally received by the court on 08/06/2020). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Douglas Price. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #3 Envelope 1) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (jl) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 08/07/2020. (jl) |
Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 08/06/2020) filed by Plaintiff Douglas Price. (jl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Price v. Nike | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nike | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Douglas Price | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.