Gomez v. Dealersocket
| Devin Gomez |
| Dealersocket |
| 2:2020cv00569 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine B. Benson on behalf of Dealersocket (Benson, Katherine) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert O. Rice on behalf of Dealersocket (Rice, Robert) |
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 9/14/2020. (lnp)
|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Dealersocket as to Dealersocket Waiver sent on 9/10/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. (Rice, Robert) |
| Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Dealersocket. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 3 Modification of Docket: Error: Complaint was filed against plaintiff. Correction: Docket text has been modified to reflect complaint is filed against defendants rather than plaintiff; answer records corrected. re #2 Complaint. (nl) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DealerSocket, Inc. against Devin Gomez (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AUTDC-3675578) filed by Devin Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (Grimes, Kenneth) Modified by correcting complaint filed against defendant on 8/12/2020 (nl). |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Plaintiff Devin Gomez is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (kn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gomez v. Dealersocket | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Devin Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth B. Grimes, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dealersocket | |
| Represented By: | Robert O. Rice |
| Represented By: | Katherine B. Benson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
