Robbins v. Resident Verify
Michael Joe Robbins |
Resident Verify |
2:2020cv00578 |
August 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Tena Campbell |
Assault Libel & Slander |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Resident Verify (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 41681091327) filed by Michael Joe Robbins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (dw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Robbins v. Resident Verify | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Resident Verify | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Joe Robbins | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.