Ram Sew v. Zazzle
| Ram Sew |
| Zazzle |
| 2:2020cv00628 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/1/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 1/1/2021. Discovery due by 8/15/2021. Motions due by 9/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/5/2020. (lnp)
|
| Filing 17 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Rammell, Justin) |
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Zazzle. (Schnibbe, Eric) |
| Filing 15 Zazzle Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #3 ) filed by Zazzle. (Schnibbe, Eric) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Stipulated Motion to Extend the Deadline to Respond to the #3 Complaint. Defendant Zazzle Inc. shall have until September 18, 2020 to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 9/15/2020. (lnp)
|
| ANSWER DEADLINE UPDATED for Zazzle answer due 9/18/2020. (lnp) |
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #3 Complaint filed by Defendant Zazzle. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Extend the Deadline to Respond to the Complaint) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Schnibbe, Eric) Modified on 9/15/2020 by linking motion to complaint and changing event type to Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (lnp). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 9/14/2020. (lnp)
|
| Filing 11 All Consent/Reassignment Forms have now been received. After review of all forms, Case Reassigned to District Judge per request of one or more party(s). Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned to the case. (alf) |
| Filing 10 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Ram Sew. (alf) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within fourteen (14) days. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 9/9/20. (alf)
|
| Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Zazzle. (alf) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Ram Sew, Defendant Zazzle. Form due by 9/24/2020. (alf) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Ram Sew, Defendant Zazzle. (jl) |
| Filing 5 File Received from Third District Court, Salt Lake County consisting of Docket Sheet, Complaint, Affidavit of Service, Notice of Removal and all applicable State Court Returns. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Complaint Return of Electronic Notification, #3 Affidavit of Service, #4 Affidavit of Service Return of Electronic Notification, #5 Notice of Removal, #6 Notice of Removal Return of Electronic Notification) (alf) |
| Filing 4 Modification of Docket: Error: Notice of removal was filed under notice. Correction: Struck the docket text and defendants refiled. re #2 Notice (Other). (jl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 200904989, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AUTDC-3710842) filed by Zazzle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (McNeill, Jason) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY ERROR - DISREGARD NOTICE of Removal by Zazzle (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (McNeill, Jason) Modified on 9/8/2020 by striking through text as entry done in error (jl). |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Defendant Zazzle is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (jl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ram Sew v. Zazzle | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zazzle | |
| Represented By: | Jason A. McNeill |
| Represented By: | Eric K. Schnibbe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ram Sew | |
| Represented By: | Justin C. Rammell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
