Saari et al v. Subzero Engineering et al
Rory Ricketts, Enrique Miranda, Christian Connor, Jordan Pietak and Robert A. Saari |
Subzero Engineering and Senneca Holdings |
2:2020cv00849 |
December 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Cecilia M Romero |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 0201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 7/31/2022. Motions due by 5/31/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 6/7/2022 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Se order for other dates and deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 1/28/21. (alf) |
Filing 27 Modification of Docket: Error: Document was efiled using the wrong attorney login. Correction: Scott Hagen is not counsel on the case. Document was /s/ by the correct attorney - David Dibble re #26 Attorney Planning Meeting. Docket text modified to reflect correct attorney on the case. (rks) |
Filing 26 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. Note: Efiled using the wrong attorney login, should have been David B. Dibble. Document is signed (/s) by correct attorney, Scott Hagen is not counsel on this case. (Hagen, Scott) Modified by adding login information on 1/26/2021 (rks). |
Filing 25 ORDER granting #22 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Neal Shah for Senneca Holdings and Subzero Engineering.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 1/20/21. (alf) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting #23 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Tess L. Castner for Senneca Holdings and Subzero Engineering.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 1/20/21. (alf) |
Filing 23 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Tessa L. Castner , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-3881692,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit B - Application)(Dibble, David) |
Filing 22 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Neal Shah , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-3881670,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit B - Application)(Dibble, David) |
Filing 21 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by Plaintiffs Christian Connor, Enrique Miranda, Jordan Pietak, Rory Ricketts, Robert A. Saari, Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering. (alf) |
Filing 20 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiffs Christian Connor, Enrique Miranda, Jordan Pietak, Rory Ricketts, Robert A. Saari. (alf) |
Filing 19 NOTICE REMINDER - All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the #12 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment,, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party's response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.# Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (alf) |
Filing 18 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering. (alf) |
Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering identifying Chase Doors Acquisition Corp. as Corporate Parent. (Dibble, David) |
Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering identifying Chase Industries, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Dibble, David) |
Filing 15 APPENDIX to #14 Defendant's MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Dismissal of Plaintiff Robert Austen Saari's Claim filed by Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Olson Decl)(Dibble, David) |
Filing 14 Defendant's MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Dismissal of Plaintiff Robert Austen Saari's Claim filed by Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering. (Dibble, David) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering.(Dibble, David) |
Filing 12 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Christian Connor, Enrique Miranda, Jordan Pietak, Rory Ricketts, Robert A. Saari, Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering. Form due by 1/13/2021. (alf) |
Filing 11 CLERKS ORDER Granting Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to #2 Complaint, signed by D. Mark Jones. Answer deadline updated for Senneca Holdings and Subzero Engineering answer to 1/12/2021. (alf) |
Filing 10 Ex Parte (Not Sealed) MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendants Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dibble, David) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jascha Kennedy Clark on behalf of Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering (Clark, Jascha) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David B. Dibble on behalf of Senneca Holdings, Subzero Engineering (Dibble, David) |
Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert A. Saari, Christian Connor, Enrique Miranda, Rory Ricketts, Jordan Pietak as to Senneca Holdings served on 12/8/2020, answer due 12/29/2020. (Haymore, Jason) |
Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert A. Saari, Christian Connor, Enrique Miranda, Rory Ricketts, Jordan Pietak as to Subzero Engineering served on 12/8/2020, answer due 12/29/2020. (Haymore, Jason) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/4/20. (alf) |
Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Senneca Holdings. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Subzero Engineering. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT Robert Austen Saari, Christian Connor, Jordan Pietak, Enrique Miranda and Rory Ricketts against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3818566) filed by Robert A. Saari, Christian Connor, Enrique Miranda, Rory Ricketts, Jordan Pietak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (Haymore, Jason) Modified on 12/2/2020 by correcting receipt number(jl). |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Plaintiffs Christian Connor, Enrique Miranda, Jordan Pietak, Rory Ricketts, Robert A. Saari is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (jl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.