Clark Canyon Hydro et al v. Idaho Power Company
| Clark Canyon Hydro |
| Idaho Power Company |
| Hydrotech Engineering |
| 2:2020mc00005 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Pursuant to the Joint Status Update #7 , this matter is STAYED for an additional thirty (30) days so the parties can continue to address discovery related matters and provide a proposed, stipulated protective order. Consistent therewith, the parties are ORDERED to file a second Joint Status Update addressing these issues, as well as the status of the stay, no later than March 24, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 02/24/2020. (amn)
|
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report by Hydrotech Engineering, Idaho Power Company. (Chambers, Joseph) |
|
Filing 6
DOCKET TEXT ORDER. In order to allow time to coordinate schedules, review documents and resolve concerns regarding the scope and burden of the subpoena, the parties' stipulated Motion To Stay Proceedings is hereby GRANTED #5 . Every thirty days during the course of the stay, the parties are ORDERED to file a Status Update advising the court as to the status of the document review and indicating whether a resolution on the pending motion to quash #2 has been reached. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/17/2020. No attached document. (amn)
|
| Filing 5 Stipulated MOTION Stay Proceedings to Allow Inspection of Storage Area and Memorandum in Support filed by Petitioner Hydrotech Engineering. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Chambers, Joseph) |
|
Filing 4
DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Prior to filing a response to Petitioner Hydrotech Engineering's Motion to Quash #2 , the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer, either in person or by telephone, no later than January 14, 2020, to discuss: (1) the concerns raised in Petitioner's motion including the issue of undue burden; and (2) whether Petitioner's motion should be transferred to the district in which the underlying case is pending. See generally, Petersen v. Douglas County Bank & Trust Co., 940 F.2d 1389, 1390 (10th Cir. 1991); Anastasion v. Credit Serv. of Logan, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82674 (D. Utah Aug 6, 2010). If the parties are unable to reach resolution through the meet and confer process, any opposition to the motion shall be filed no later than January 21, 2020, and a reply no later than January 28, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/7/2020. (amn)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636(b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 1/6/2020. (cdp)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Quash Subpoena (Montana Federal District Court) and Memorandum in Support filed by Petitioner Hydrotech Engineering. (Chambers, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Clark Waddoups. Petitioner Hydrotech Engineering is directed to E-File the Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee (found under Other Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 47.00 by the end of the business day. Once the filing fee event is completed the initiating document (Motion to Quash and cover sheet ) may be E-filed.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
| Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee for Motion to Quash received from Petitioner Hydrotech Engineering. (Filing fee $ 47, receipt number 1088-3453922). (Chambers, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
