RHN Incorporated v. CNA National Warranty Corporation et al
| RHN Incorporated |
| Centinela Car Wash Properties LLC, H.S.K. Investments LLC, 3710 Cherry Avenue Property LLC, Redondo Properties LLC, 737 N La Brea LLC, CNA National Warranty Corporation and Kip Properties LLC |
| David Arnold |
| 2:2020mc00852 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to G. David Godwin. (jrj) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE re #7 Declaration, #9 Order,, filed by CNA National Warranty Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subpoena Duces Tecum, #2 Exhibit 2 - Feb. 25, 2020 Declaration of David Arnold, #3 Exhibit 3 - Oct 19, 2020 Declaration of David Arnold, #4 Exhibit 4 - PVIS Felix Depo Transcript (in relevant part), #5 Exhibit 5 - David Arnold Depo Transcript (in relevant part), #6 Exhibit 6 - Emails between D. Arnold and L. DiFrancesco re Meet & Confer Request, #7 Exhibit 7 - Override Agreement (signed), #8 Exhibit 8 - Personal Guaranty (signed))(DiFrancesco, Lauren) |
|
|
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT A re #7 Declaration of David Arnold. (jrj) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of David Arnold. (jrj) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #2 MOTION to Compel Production of Responsive Documents From David Arnold filed by Defendant CNA National Warranty Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DiFrancesco, Lauren) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE for Short Form Discovery Motion to Compel Response to Subpoena Duces Tecum served on David Arnold on December 19, 2020, filed by Defendant CNA National Warranty Corporation. (DiFrancesco, Lauren) |
| Filing 4 Modification of Docket: Error: Filing attorney was listed as plaintiff's attorney. Correction: Changed attorney to defendant CNA National Warranty Corporation's attorney and modified docket text to reflect this change. re Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee, 1 Remark - New Case, #2 MOTION to Compel Production of Responsive Documents . (jl) |
|
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Compel Production of Responsive Documents filed by Defendant CNA National Warranty Corporation . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(DiFrancesco, Lauren) Modified on 12/7/2020 (nl). Modified on 12/7/2020 by changing filer to defendant CNA National Warranty Corporation (jl). |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Barlow. Defendant CNA National Warranty Corporation is directed to E-File the Motion to Compel (found under Other Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 49 by the end of the business day. Once the filing fee event is completed the initiating document (Motion to Compel and cover sheet ) may be E-filed.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (jl) Modified on 12/7/2020 by changing party directed to file to defendant CNA National Warranty Corporation (jl). |
| Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee for Motion to Compel received from Defendant CNA National Warranty Corporation. (Filing fee $ 49, receipt number AUTDC-3820789). (DiFrancesco, Lauren) Modified on 12/7/2020 by changing who filed to defendant (jl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.