Gagon et al v. Pristine Pools and Spa
Plaintiff: Shane Gagon and Gina Gagon
Defendant: Pristine Pools and Spa
Case Number: 2:2021cv00071
Filed: February 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Referring Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2021 Filing 6 ERRATA to #2 Notice of Removal, filed by Defendant Pristine Pools and Spa . (Martin, Byron)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 6/4/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 6/4/2021. Expert Discovery due by 3/11/2022. Motions due by 4/8/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/22/2022 at 03:00 PM in Rm 3.400 before Judge Tena Campbell. 5-Day Jury Trial set for 9/12/2022 at 08:30 AM in Rm 3.400 before Judge Tena. Campbell. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 2/24/21 (alt)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. So ordered by Judge Tena Campbell on 2/22/21 (docket text only - no attached document) (alt)
February 17, 2021 Filing 3 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order )(Larsen, Kristine)
February 2, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Carbon County, case number 200700058, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3902164) filed by Pristine Pools and Spa. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Service of Process, #3 Exhibit 3- Answer, #4 Exhibit 4- Idaho Filings, #5 Exhibit 5- Docket and Filings, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (Martin, Byron)
February 2, 2021 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Defendant Pristine Pools and Spa is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (jl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gagon et al v. Pristine Pools and Spa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shane Gagon
Represented By: Kristine M. Larsen
Represented By: Blake M. Biddulph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Gagon
Represented By: Kristine M. Larsen
Represented By: Blake M. Biddulph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pristine Pools and Spa
Represented By: Byron G. Martin
Represented By: Axel Trumbo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?