Smith v. USA
| Marlon Alonzo Smith |
| USA |
| 2:2021cv00081 |
| February 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Nuffer |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
RESPONSE to Government's Motion re #4 MOTION for Acknowledgement of Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege MOTION for Discovery MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Petitioner Marlon Alonzo Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER taking under advisement #4 Motion for Acknowledgement of Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege; taking under advisement #4 Motion for Discovery; taking under advisement #4 Motion for Extension. Petitioner must file a response on or before 3/31/21: failure to file a response will result in the Motion being granted. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 3/10/21 (alt) Modified on 3/10/2021: removed unwanted "Sealed" designation (alt)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by USA re #4 MOTION Acknowledgement of Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), and Memorandum in Support MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 Order to Respond (2255) and Memorandum in Support (Clark, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Acknowledgement of Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Memorandum in Support, MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support, MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) and Memorandum in Support filed by Respondent USA. (Clark, Aaron) Modified on 3/10/2021: corrected motion reliefs, links, and docket entry text (alt)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL of Angela Jean Clifford-Salisbury filed by Angela Jean Clifford-Salisbury on behalf of USA (Clifford-Salisbury, Angela)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO RESPOND - USA must respond to #1 Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion to Vacate within 60 days of this order. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 2/12/21 (alt)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Related case: 2:16-cr-00020-DN. No filing fee required. AUSA added to the case: Yes. filed by Marlon Alonzo Smith. (Attachments: #1 Supplement 2nd Motion to Vacate, #2 Supplement Argument, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Envelope 1) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (mh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Aaron B. Clark |
| Represented By: | Angela Jean Clifford-Salisbury |
| Represented By: | S. Michael Gadd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marlon Alonzo Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
