Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Recreation Properties Unlimited et al
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| Linda Hicken, Diane Fenn, Irene Curtis, Recreation Properties Unlimited, Keith Hicken, Douglas Hicken, Kenneth Hicken and Ilene Curtis |
| 2:2021cv00136 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Recreation Properties Unlimited.(Brough, Daniel) |
Filing 25
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #24 Second Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant Recreation Properties Unlimited LLC's deadline to respond to the complaint is extended to April 16, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 4/15/2021. No attached document. (eh)
|
| Filing 24 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, filed by Defendant Recreation Properties Unlimited. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Second Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)(Brough, Daniel) |
|
Filing 23
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #22 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant Recreation Properties Unlimited LLC's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to April 14, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 4/13/2021. No attached document. (eh)
|
| Filing 22 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendant Recreation Properties Unlimited. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)(Brough, Daniel) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel K. Brough on behalf of Recreation Properties Unlimited (Brough, Daniel) |
| Filing 20 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scottsdale Insurance Company as to Kenneth Hicken served on 4/9/2021, answer due 4/30/2021. (Neilson, Chet) |
| Filing 19 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ilene Curtis by Scottsdale Insurance Company served on 3/23/21, Answer due 4/13/21 (Neilson, Chet) Modified on 3/31/2021 to add text as to party, service date and answer deadline (alf). |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #14 Summons Returned Executed. The document is filed as a Return of Summons Executed as to defendant Ilene Curtis. The court issued summons attached to the filing is as to Recreational Properties Unlimited LLC. Please attach the correct court issued summons as to Ilene Curtis or change the filing to service on Recreational Properties LLC. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. (alf) |
| Filing 17 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scottsdale Insurance Company as to Linda Hicken served on 3/26/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Neilson, Chet) |
| Filing 16 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scottsdale Insurance Company as to Diane Fenn served on 3/26/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Neilson, Chet) |
| Filing 15 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scottsdale Insurance Company as to Douglas Hicken served on 3/25/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (Neilson, Chet) |
| Filing 14 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scottsdale Insurance Company as to Ilene Curtis served on 3/23/2021, answer due 4/13/2021. (Neilson, Chet) Modified on 3/30/2021- document stricken as improperly filed. The court issued summons attached is for a different defendant (alf). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #12 Certificate of Service. The document is stricken as improperly filed. Should be filed using the event Summons Returned Executed. Filing MUST include Court Issued Summons with signature by Clerk of Court or Deputy. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. (alf) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Scottsdale Insurance Company re #11 Summons Issued Electronically, Delivered via Personal Service (Neilson, Chet) Modified on 3/25/2021 - document stricken as improperly filed (alf). |
| Filing 11 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Ilene Curtis. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against All Defendants. New Defendants: Ilene Curtis. Removed Defendants: Irene Curtis. filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Neilson, Chet) |
| Filing 9 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Recreation Properties Unlimited. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 8 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Linda Hicken. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Kenneth Hicken. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Douglas Hicken. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Diane Fenn. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 3/8/21. (alf)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Disclosure Statement of Scottsdale Insurance Company by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Neilson, Chet) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3944826) filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet (1)) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (Neilson, Chet) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
