Poulsen v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance et al
Arlette Poulsen |
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance and Meridian Security Insurance |
2:2021cv00305 |
May 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Howard C Nielson |
Dustin B Pead |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting Extension of Time to Propose Scheduling Order: The Parties need not propose a scheduling order until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Bifurcate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 6/6/21. (dla) |
Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time To Propose Scheduling Order filed by Defendants Meridian Security Insurance, State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Trumbo, Axel) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint: Defendants have until June 9, 2021 to serve a response to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 6/7/21. (dla) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Meridian Security Insurance, State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance.(Goebel, Heidi) |
Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Defendants Meridian Security Insurance, State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Martin, Byron) |
Filing 6 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Lowrance, John) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within 21 days after any defendant has been served or any defendant has appeared, unless any party is appearing pro se.. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 5/20/21 (alt) |
Filing 4 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 5/19/21. (dla) |
Filing 3 ERRATA to #2 Notice of Removal, filed by Defendants Meridian Security Insurance, State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Complaints, #2 Exhibit 2- Served Process, #3 Exhibit 3- Served Third Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4- Docket and Served Papers, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Byron) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4006413) filed by Meridian Security Insurance, State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaints, #2 Exhibit 2 - Served Process, #3 Exhibit 3 - Served Third Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4 - Docket and Served Papers, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (Trumbo, Axel) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendants Meridian Security Insurance, State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.