Harris v. Honor
Shakim Harris |
Lenon Honor |
2:2021cv00350 |
June 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Howard C Nielson |
Daphne A Oberg |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment Form has now been passed. The form was not filed, therefore the case is ineligible for magistrate assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned to the case as presider. (alf) |
Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Shakim Harris Notice to Pro Se Plaintiff #3 . (alf) |
Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Shakim Harris - Document #1 - Sealed Motion (alf) |
Filing 8 Amended Report on the Filing of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint) (mh) (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/14/2021) (nl). |
Filing 7 ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT BY 7/12/21. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 6/14/21. Failure to do so may result in an order or recommendation to dismiss this action.(alf) |
Filing 6 Report on the Filing of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (mh) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Lenon Honor (Originally received by the court on 06/04/2021). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Shakim Harris. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Pro Se Motion, #2 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (mh) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 06/07/2021. (mh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 28 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Shakim Harris. Form due by 7/2/2021. (alf) |
Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, ProSe Motion and Civil Cover Sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pro Se Motion to Self Represent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mh) |
Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 06/04/2021) filed by Plaintiff Shakim Harris. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harris v. Honor | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lenon Honor | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shakim Harris | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.