Lopez v. Wise Safety Environmental
| Brenda L. Lopez |
| Wise Safety Environmental and Mallory |
| 2:2021cv00391 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued as to Wise Safety Environmental. (mh) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Wise Safety Environmental (Originally received by the court on 06/24/2021). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Brenda L. Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (mh) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 06/24/2021. (mh)
|
| Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint with Jury Trial Demand and Civil Cover Sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mh) |
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 06/24/2021) filed by Plaintiff Brenda L. Lopez. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
