Layton Capital v. Jones
| Layton Capital |
| Blair Jones |
| 2:2021cv00448 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Layton Capital. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Paul Drecksel, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Craig Bailey)(Williams, David) |
| Filing 22 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION of Blair Jones in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Blair Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" (Email, dated March 9,2017), #2 Exhibit "B" (Joinder of Additional Shareholders), #3 Exhibit "C" (Email, dated March 12, 2019), #4 Exhibit "D" (Email, dated December 4, 2019), #5 Exhibit "E" (Email, dated December 18, 2019 and 2018 K-1), #6 Exhibit "F" (Text string with Craig Bailey))(Shields, Zachary) |
| Filing 21 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION of Aziz Ayubi in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Blair Jones. (Shields, Zachary) |
| Filing 20 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION of Drew Wagner in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Blair Jones. (Shields, Zachary) |
| Filing 19 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION of Jim Scates in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Blair Jones. (Shields, Zachary) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Blair Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit "1" (Filings with the Utah Department of Commerce))(Shields, Zachary) |
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 12/1/2021. Expert Discovery due by 10/3/2022. Dispositive or Potentially Dispositive Motions due by 11/1/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/23/21. (dla)
|
| Filing 16 Motions No Longer Referred: #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support (dla) |
|
Filing 15
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 8/20/21. (dla)
|
|
Filing 14
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Defendant shall file a response to #11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction no later than September 2, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr., on 8/19/2021. (mlp)
|
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendant Blair Jones. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shields, Zachary) |
| Filing 12 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order - Scheduling)(Williams, David) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Layton Capital. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Layton Capital, Inc. 2016 Shareholders Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Text Message, #3 Exhibit C - Cease and Desist Letter)(Williams, David) |
| Filing 10 All Consent/Reassignment Forms have now been received. After review of all forms, Case Reassigned to District Judge per request of one or more party(s). Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assigned to the case. (alf) |
| Filing 9 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Blair Jones. (alf) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) with Jury Demand filed by Blair Jones. (Shields, Zachary) |
| Filing 7 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Layton Capital. (jwt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff(s) must propose a discovery schedule to defendant(s) in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within twenty-one (21) days after any defendant has been served or any defendant has appeared, unless any party is appearing pro se. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 07/27/2021. (jl)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Blair Jones, Plaintiff Layton Capital. Form due by 8/10/2021. (jwt) |
| Filing 4 File Received from 3rd District Court, Salt Lake County consisting of Docket Sheet, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support, Notice of Removal to Federal Court, and applicable state court returns. (Attachments: #1 State Document-Complaint, #2 State Document-Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Document-Return of Electronic Notification, #4 State Document-Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #5 State Document-Return of Electronic Notification for Motion, #6 State Document-Return of Service, #7 State Document-Electronic Notification for Return of Service, #8 State Document-Notice of Removal to Federal Court, #9 State Document-Return of Service for Notice of Removal) (jl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Blair Jones, Plaintiff Layton Capital. (mh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court, Salt Lake County, case number 210903661, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4064805) filed by Blair Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint as filed, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - Docket, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead (Trumbo, Axel) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead. Defendant Blair Jones is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Layton Capital v. Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Layton Capital | |
| Represented By: | Mark O. Morris |
| Represented By: | David P. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Blair Jones | |
| Represented By: | Byron G. Martin |
| Represented By: | Axel Trumbo |
| Represented By: | Zachary T. Shields |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
