BMO Harris Bank NA v. Derrick D. Hicken Transporation et al
| BMO Harris Bank NA |
| Derrick D. Hicken Transporation and Derrick D. Hicken |
| 2:2021cv00471 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by BMO Harris Bank NA as to Derrick D. Hicken served on 8/24/2021, answer due 9/14/2021. (Muir, P.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #8 Return of Service. The document was incorrectly filed under the wrong event. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading by choosing Summons Returned Executed. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. (jl) |
| Filing 8 ***STRICKEN-DISREGARD*** **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** RETURN OF SERVICE Executed for Personal Summons and Complaint served on Derrick D. Hicken on 8/24/2021, filed by Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank NA. (Muir, P.) Modified by striking as incorrect event chosen on 9/2/2021 (jl). |
| Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Derrick D. Hicken Transporation. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nmt) |
| Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Derrick D. Hicken. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nmt) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/12/21. (dla)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 8/11/2021. (mjm)
|
| Filing 3 ERRATA to #2 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank NA Civil Cover Sheet. (Muir, P.) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4071996) filed by BMO Harris Bank NA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A First Loan Agreement, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B Second Loan Agreement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C Third Loan Agreement, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D Titles, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E Guaranties, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F Demands) Assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby (Muir, P.) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby. Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank NA is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
