Digital Verification Systems v. eFileCabinet
Plaintiff: Digital Verification Systems
Defendant: eFileCabinet
Case Number: 2:2021cv00522
Filed: September 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Referring Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time: Defendant eFile Cabinet, Inc. shall have through and including November 29, 2021, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 11/1/21. (dla)
October 29, 2021 Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Digital Verification Systems. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer the Complaint) Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero.(Dobbin, Geoffrey)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with Order to Propose Schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/22/21. (dla)
October 22, 2021 Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time the meet and confer and filing requirements of Section 2 of the Order to Propose Schedule filed by Plaintiff Digital Verification Systems. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Stipulated Motion) Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero.(Dobbin, Geoffrey)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time: The time for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended until and including October 30, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/1/21. (dla)
September 30, 2021 Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant eFileCabinet. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time) Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero. Attorney Chad S. Pehrson added to party eFileCabinet(pty:dft)(Pehrson, Chad)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 9/14/21. (dla)
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 9/13/21. (dla)
September 10, 2021 Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Digital Verification Systems as to eFileCabinet served on 9/9/2021, answer due 9/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Court Issued Summons)(Dobbin, Geoffrey)
September 7, 2021 Filing 5 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mh)
September 7, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Jay Johnson and D. Bradley Kizzia, for Plaintiff Digital Verification Systems. (mh)
September 7, 2021 Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to eFileCabinet. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nmt)
September 3, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT patent infringement against eFileCabinet (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4102756) filed by Digital Verification Systems. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Patent No. 9,054,860, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Signed Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Rule 7.1 Disclosure) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (Dobbin, Geoffrey)
September 3, 2021 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Plaintiff Digital Verification Systems is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (mh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Digital Verification Systems v. eFileCabinet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Digital Verification Systems
Represented By: Geoffrey E. Dobbin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: eFileCabinet
Represented By: Chad S. Pehrson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?