Mamone et al v. Wood et al
| Madison Mamone and Marissa Johnson |
| Summer Wood, Paige Heslop, Greyson Dixon, Kayleigh Dixon, Eric Koyle Hyde, Kathy A Hyde and SBRI Property Management |
| 2:2021cv00584 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 2511 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Service of Process. Summons to be served on: Summer Wood and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs Marissa Johnson, Madison Mamone. (Smith, Gregory) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #8 Notice (Other). The document needs to be refiled as a Motion and is stricken as improperly filed at direction from chambers. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. (alf) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of motion for alternative service by Marissa Johnson, Madison Mamone re #6 Summons Returned Unexecuted (Smith, Gregory) Modified on 12/3/2021 - stricken as improperly filed(alf). |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Marissa Johnson, Madison Mamone as to Greyson Dixon Waiver sent on 11/15/2021, answer due 1/14/2022; Kayleigh Dixon Waiver sent on 11/15/2021, answer due 1/14/2022; Paige Heslop Waiver sent on 11/15/2021, answer due 1/14/2022; Eric Koyle Hyde Waiver sent on 11/15/2021, answer due 1/14/2022; Kathy A Hyde Waiver sent on 11/15/2021, answer due 1/14/2022; SBRI Property Management Waiver sent on 11/15/2021, answer due 1/14/2022. (Smith, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** Summons Returned Unexecuted by Marissa Johnson, Madison Mamone as to Summer Wood. (Attachments: #1 Supplement summons)(Smith, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Summer Wood. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nmt) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS filed by Marissa Johnson, Madison Mamone re #2 Complaint,. (Smith, Gregory) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/6/21. (alf)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4130934) filed by Marissa Johnson, Madison Mamone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet cover sheet, #2 Exhibit exhibit) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (Smith, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Plaintiffs Marissa Johnson, Madison Mamone is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
