Georgelas v. Hill
| Tammy B. Georgelas as Receiver for Roger S. Bliss, and individual, and Roger S. Bliss d/b/a Roger Bliss and Associates Equities, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Roger Bliss and Associates Club LLC, Bliss Club LLC |
| David Hill |
| 2:2021cv00667 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0077 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Motion for Transfer of New Ancillary Case Against David Hill by Tammy B. Georgelas (Cooper, John)
|
|
Filing 5
** RESTRICTED DOCUMENT ** WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Tammy B. Georgelas as to David Hill Waiver sent on 11/12/2021, answer due 1/11/2022. (Rothschild, Brian)
|
|
Filing 4
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to David Hill. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nmt)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff(s) must propose a discovery schedule to defendant(s) in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within twenty-one (21) days after any defendant has been served or any defendant has appeared, unless any party is appearing pro se. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/11/2021. (jl)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against David Hill (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4161834) filed by Tammy B. Georgelas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead (Rothschild, Brian)
|
|
Filing 1
Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead. Plaintiff Tammy B. Georgelas is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (mh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Georgelas v. Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tammy B. Georgelas as Receiver for Roger S. Bliss, and individual, and Roger S. Bliss d/b/a Roger Bliss and Associates Equities, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Roger Bliss and Associates Club LLC, Bliss Club LLC | |
| Represented By: | Katherine E. Venti |
| Represented By: | Brian M. Rothschild |
| Represented By: | John L. Cooper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Hill | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
