Wells v. Walmart Associates
Plaintiff: Tyler J. Wells
Defendant: Walmart Associates
Case Number: 2:2021cv00748
Filed: December 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2022 Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Tyler J. Wells. (alf)
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER terminating as moot #5 Motion to Change Venue. The court will screen this action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and DUCivR 3-2(b). The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. If the action is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on the Defendant(s). Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents during the time the case is being screened. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/28/2021. (jl)
December 27, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro Se Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 28 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Tyler J. Wells. Form due by 1/24/2022. (mh)
December 27, 2021 Set/Reset Deadlines: Form due by 1/24/2022. (mh)
December 23, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Change Venue filed by Plaintiff Tyler J. Wells. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Statement Supporting Motion to Change Venue)(nmt)
December 23, 2021 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Walmart Associates (Originally received by the court on 12/22/2021). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Tyler J. Wells. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Email Filing & Notification) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (nmt)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/23/2021. (nmt)
December 22, 2021 Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Motion to Change Venue, Statement Supporting Motion, and Email Filing and Notification.. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Motion to Change Venue, #3 Statement Supporting Motion, #4 Email Filing and Notification)(nmt)
December 22, 2021 Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 12/22/2021) filed by Plaintiff Tyler J. Wells. (nmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wells v. Walmart Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyler J. Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?