USA v. 28000 Dollars in US Currency et al
| USA |
| 28000 Dollars in US Currency and 9000 Dollars in US Currency |
| 2:2021cv00749 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 0881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Notice of Mailing by USA (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C) (Woolf, Mark)
|
|
Filing 3
Warrant and Summons for Arrest of Articles in Rem ISSUED as to $28,000 in U.S. Currency and $9,000 in U.S. Currency on 12/23/2021, by Anne Morgan. (jl)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against 28000 Dollars in US Currency, 9000 Dollars in US Currency No Filing Fee filed by USA. Assigned to Judge David Barlow (Woolf, Mark)
|
|
Filing 1
Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Barlow. Plaintiff USA is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) by the end of the business day. Filing Fee waived (USA)NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nmt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
