Johnson v. Progressive Leasing et al
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: Progressive Leasing, NPRTO New York and American Arbitration Association
Case Number: 2:2022cv00052
Filed: January 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Referring Judge: Robert J Shelby
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DOCKET TEXT ORDER finding as moot #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Per #8 Order, Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed without the prepayment of filing fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 03/14/2022. No attached document. (cvm)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Originally received by the court on 1/26/2022). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Robert W. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #3 Envelope 1) Assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby (af)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit an amended complaint that satisfies the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than March 25, 2022. It is furthered ordered: 1. Once filed, the court will screen the amended complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and DUCivR 3-2(b). 2. The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. 3. If the action is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on the Defendants. 4. Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents during the time the case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 2/25/2022. (af)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 The Consent/Reassignment Form has now been received. Case Reassigned to District Judge per request of party(s). Case randomly assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby as presider and assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero s (b)(1)(B) referral judge. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to the case as presider. Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero.(alf)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Robert W. Johnson. (alf)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 **SEALED DOCUMENT** AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 02/14/2022) filed by Plaintiff Robert W. Johnson. (mh)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ON APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES: Petitioner is ORDERED to submit the attached Non-Incarcerated IFP Form no later than February 12, 2022. Failure to submit the required financial information will result in recommendation the application be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 01/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Nonincarcerated Party))(mh)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 28 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Robert W. Johnson. Form due by 2/24/2022. (alf)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, Exhibit, Civil Cover Sheet, Envelope. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(af)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 1/26/2022) filed by Plaintiff Robert W. Johnson. (af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Progressive Leasing et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Leasing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NPRTO New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Arbitration Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?