Liender v. L3Harris Technologies
Plaintiff: Joey Liender
Defendant: L3Harris Technologies
Case Number: 2:2022cv00081
Filed: February 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant L3Harris Technologies. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(alf)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re Complaint contained in #2 Notice of Removal. Answer deadline updated for L3Harris Technologies to 3/11/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 2/24/22. (alf)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendant L3Harris Technologies. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint)(O'Brien, Michael)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by Defendant L3Harris Technologies, Plaintiff Joey Liender. (alf)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Joey Liender. (alf)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERKS ORDER of Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint signed by Anne W. Morgan, Chief Deputy. Answer deadline updated for L3Harris Technologies to 3/1/2022. (alf)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant L3Harris Technologies. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(O'Brien, Michael)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant L3Harris Technologies. (alf)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 File downloaded from Third District Court, Salt Lake County Web Xchange consisting of Docket Sheet, Complaint, Memorandum re: Inability to pay Fees (NOTE: Exhibits A-T were filed under seal and are not acccessible), Proposed Order, Declaration of Attempts, Order denying Motion to Waive Fees, Amended Motion to Waive Fees, Proposed Order, Order granting Amended Motion to Waive Fees and Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Memorandum re: inability to pay, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Declaration of Attempts, #5 Order Denying Motion to Waive Fees, #6 Amended Motion to Waive Fees, #7 Proposed Order, #8 Order to Waive Fees, #9 Notice of Removal) (alf)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant L3Harris Technologies, Plaintiff Joey Liender. Form due by 2/23/2022. (alf)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Joey Liender. (mh)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 220900351, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4243800) filed by L3Harris Technologies. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (O'Brien, Michael)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Defendant L3Harris Technologies is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liender v. L3Harris Technologies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joey Liender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L3Harris Technologies
Represented By: Michael P. O'Brien
Represented By: Mark D. Tolman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?