Harley Davidson of Salt Lake City v. Harley Davidson Motor Company
Harley Davidson of Salt Lake City |
Harley Davidson Motor Company |
2:2022cv00112 |
February 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Dustin B Pead |
Robert J Shelby |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Foutz, Tyler) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Conference Pursuant to FRCP 16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/11/22. (dla) |
Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time Scheduling Conference Pursuant to FRCP 16 and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Harley Davidson of Salt Lake City. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Foutz, Tyler) |
Filing 12 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: The court has reviewed Defendant's Response to the Order to Show Cause #10 . For the time being, the court is satisfied that Defendant has established subject matter jurisdiction. (dla) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Roberta F. Howell for Harley Davidson Motor Company.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 3/18/2022. (jwt) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #7 Order to Show Cause, filed by Harley Davidson Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Decl. Craig Greenwood, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Decl. Robert Stewart)(Stewart, Robert) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Roberta F. Howell , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-4277033,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant Harley Davidson Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pro Hac Vice Application of Roberta F. Howell, #2 (Proposed) Order)(Stewart, Robert) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 3/14/2022. (mjm) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Defendant is ORDERED to show cause, within fourteen (14) days, why the case should not be remanded to the State of Utah Third District Court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 3/1/22. (dla) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) filed by Harley Davidson Motor Company. (Stewart, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Roberta F. Howell, for Defendant Harley Davidson Motor Company. (mh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Harley Davidson Motor Company, Plaintiff Harley Davidson of Salt Lake City. (mh) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Harley Davidson Motor Company identifying Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Stewart, Robert) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court, Salt Lake County, case number 210905992, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BUTDC-4254755) filed by Harley Davidson Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby (Stewart, Robert) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby. Defendant Harley Davidson Motor Company is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harley Davidson of Salt Lake City v. Harley Davidson Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Harley Davidson of Salt Lake City | |
Represented By: | Tyler S. Foutz |
Represented By: | Brooke Ashton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Harley Davidson Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Robert T. Stewart |
Represented By: | Roberta F. Howell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.