McQueen v. Starbucks Corporation
| Harmony McQueen |
| Starbucks Corporation |
| 2:2022cv00270 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 12/30/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 12/30/2022. Expert Discovery due by 7/28/2023. Dispositive or Potentially Dispositive Motions due by 8/25/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 6/9/22. (dla)
|
|
Filing 13
DOCKET TEXT ORDER TO SUBMIT PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. The court is in receipt of the #10 Attorney Planning Meeting Report. As previously directed in paragraph 2(a) of the #4 Order to Propose Schedule, the parties are ordered to submit a proposed scheduling order in Microsoft Word format directly to chambers email at utdecf_romero@utd.uscourts.gov within three days from the date of this order. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 6/1/2022. (jfm)
|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Harmony McQueen Initial Disclosures (Carr, K.) |
|
Filing 11
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 5/31/22. (dla)
|
| Filing 10 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Carr, K.) |
| Filing 9 The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment Forms has now passed. One or more of the parties failed to file, therefore the case is ineligible for magistrate assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned to the case. (alf) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE REMINDER - All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the #5 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment,, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party's response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.# Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (alf) |
| Filing 7 Starbucks Corporation's ANSWER to Complaint filed by Starbucks Corporation.(Thuet, Heather) |
| Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (mh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Harmony McQueen, Defendant Starbucks Corporation. Form due by 5/5/2022. (mh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff(s) must propose a schedule to Defendant(s) in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report, available on the District of Utah's website at https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-scheduling, within fourteen (14) days. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 04/20/2022. (jl)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Harmony McQueen, Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (mh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Third District Court Salt Lake County, case number 22-0901805, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4311089) filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A: Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Notice of Removal: Third District) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (Thuet, Heather) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Defendant Starbucks Corporation is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McQueen v. Starbucks Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Harmony McQueen | |
| Represented By: | K. Bradley Carr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Starbucks Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Heather Lynnae Thuet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
