M. et al v. SAS Institute et al
Plaintiff: Thomas M. and E. M.
Defendant: SAS Institute the SAS Institute Inc. Medical Plan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, SAS Institute and SAS Institute Inc. Medical Plan
Case Number: 2:2022cv00297
Filed: May 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jared C Bennett
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2022 Filing 19 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Eastern District of North Carolina via electronic given case number 5:22-cv-00268. (nl)
July 11, 2022 Filing 18 Interdistrict Transfer to Eastern District of North Carolina. Record transferred to receiving court electronically. All future documents should be filed in Eastern District of North Carolina District Court. Case closed. (jl)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Motion to Transfer Venue: the Court grants the stipulated motion to transfer this action to the Eastern District of North Carolina. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer this action to the Eastern District of North Carolina. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 07/11/2022. (jl)
July 11, 2022 Filing 16 Stipulated MOTION to Change Venue filed by Defendants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, SAS Institute. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Transfer Venue)(Tolman, Mark)
June 15, 2022 Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by Defendants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, SAS Institute, Plaintiffs E. M., Thomas M.. (alf)
June 15, 2022 Filing 14 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiffs E. M., Thomas M.. (alf)
June 8, 2022 Filing 13 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, SAS Institute. (alf)
June 3, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, SAS Institute, Plaintiffs E. M., Thomas M.. (alf)
June 3, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, SAS Institute, Plaintiffs E. M., Thomas M.. Form due by 6/21/2022. (alf)
June 2, 2022 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Thomas M., E. M. as to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina Waiver sent on 6/1/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. (Abke, Kathleen)
June 2, 2022 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Thomas M., E. M. as to SAS Institute Waiver sent on 6/1/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. (Abke, Kathleen)
May 13, 2022 Filing 8 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas M., E. M. (Abke, Kathleen)
May 12, 2022 Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas M., E. M. as to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina served on 5/11/2022, answer due 6/1/2022. (Abke, Kathleen)
May 12, 2022 Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas M., E. M. as to SAS Institute served on 5/11/2022, answer due 6/1/2022. (Abke, Kathleen)
May 9, 2022 Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh)
May 6, 2022 Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to SAS Institute. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh)
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 5/3/22. (alf)
May 2, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, SAS Institute the SAS Institute Inc. Medical Plan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4322668) filed by Thomas M., E. M.. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (Abke, Kathleen)
May 2, 2022 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Plaintiffs E. M., Thomas M. is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: M. et al v. SAS Institute et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas M.
Represented By: Kathleen J. Abke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: E. M.
Represented By: Kathleen J. Abke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAS Institute the SAS Institute Inc. Medical Plan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
Represented By: Mark D. Tolman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAS Institute
Represented By: Mark D. Tolman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAS Institute Inc. Medical Plan
Represented By: Mark D. Tolman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?