Duong v. Ly et al
Plaintiff: Ann Nguyen Duong
Defendant: Vinh K. Ly, Quoc Minh Nguyen and Chelsea Koch
Case Number: 2:2022cv00315
Filed: May 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Dustin B Pead
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Requiring Plaintiffs to File Proof of Service and Limit Other Filings.1. After defendants are served, Plaintiffs must file proof of service.2. Plaintiffs must not file other documents until proof of service is filed, a defendant appears in this case, or the court orders otherwise. If Plaintiffs file other documents, they will be lodged on the docket and will not be addressed until one of these events occurs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 06/24/2022. (jl)
May 19, 2022 Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Ann Nguyen Duong. (alf)
May 18, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Ann Nguyen Duong. (alf)
May 10, 2022 Filing 4 Remark: Attached email filing and electronic notification form mailed to plaintiff. (alf)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. The Clerk's Office is directed to provide Ms. Duong with the email filing and electronic notification form for unrepresented parties. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 05/10/2022.
May 9, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 28 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Ann Nguyen Duong. Form due by 6/6/2022. (alf)
May 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chelsea Koch, Vinh K. Ly, Quoc Minh Nguyen (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 4681098563) (Fee Status: Paid) filed by Ann Nguyen Duong. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead (mh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duong v. Ly et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ann Nguyen Duong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vinh K. Ly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quoc Minh Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chelsea Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?