Allergy Research Group v. Moneva et al
| Allergy Research Group |
| Pavlina Moneva, Dimitar Ganashev and Valko Arapkiuliev |
| 2:2022cv00366 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Allergy Research Group as to Dimitar Ganashev served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. (Call, Monica) |
| Filing 11 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Allergy Research Group as to Pavlina Moneva served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. (Call, Monica) |
| Filing 10 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Allergy Research Group as to Valko Arapkiuliev served on 6/1/2022, answer due 6/22/2022. (Call, Monica) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Martha Brewer Motley, for Plaintiff Allergy Research Group (ks) |
| Filing 8 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ks) |
| Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Dimitar Ganashev. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
| Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Pavlina Moneva. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Valko Arapkiuliev. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/31/22. (alf)
|
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Allergy Research Group identifying Kikkoman Corp. as Corporate Parent. (Call, Monica) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4345458) filed by Allergy Research Group. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (Call, Monica) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Plaintiff Allergy Research Group is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to [email protected] for issuance. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
