Larsen v. Auto Owners Insurance
Plaintiff: Jasen Larsen
Defendant: Auto Owners Insurance
Case Number: 2:2022cv00453
Filed: July 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Referring Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract- Insurance
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of acknowledgment of receipt re #12 Notice of Transmittal. (jl)
August 12, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to 3rd District Court, Salt Lake County via via mail docket sheet and remand order sent given case number 210903389. (jl)
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Remand to State Court - this action shall be remanded to the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to remand this action to the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah, Civil No. 210903389. Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 08/12/2022. (jl)
August 12, 2022 Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION to Remand to State Court Third District Court of Salt Lake County filed by Defendant Auto Owners Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order of Remand (Proposed))(Trayner, Stephen)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 8/11/22. (dla)
August 8, 2022 Filing 8 First MOTION to Remand to 3rd District Court for Salt Lake County Case No. 210903389 and Memorandum in Support with Exhibits/Declaration filed by Plaintiff Jasen Larsen. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order on Plaintiff's motion to remand, #2 Exhibit A Declaration of KHM, #3 Exhibit A to Declaration of KHM, #4 Exhibit B to Motion to Remand)(Macfarlane, Kelly)
August 1, 2022 Filing 7 The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment forms has now passed. One or more of the parties failed to file, therefore the case is ineligible for magistrate assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned to the case. (alf)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff(s) must propose a schedule to Defendant(s) in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report, available on the District of Utah's website at https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-scheduling, within fourteen (14) days. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 07/11/2022. (jl)
July 8, 2022 Filing 5 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Auto Owners Insurance. (alf)
July 8, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return #the form on this link To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not file the Consent Form in the case.Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Auto Owners Insurance, Plaintiff Jasen Larsen. Form due by 7/29/2022. (alf)
July 8, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Auto Owners Insurance, Plaintiff Jasen Larsen. (nl)
July 8, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 210903389, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BUTDC-4386126) filed by Auto Owners Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit in Support of Notice of Removal (3rd District Court Pleadings)) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (Trayner, Stephen)
July 8, 2022 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Defendant Auto Owners Insurance is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (ks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larsen v. Auto Owners Insurance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jasen Larsen
Represented By: Kelly H. Macfarlane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auto Owners Insurance
Represented By: Stephen J. Trayner
Represented By: John M. Zidow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?