Castro et al v. Utah County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff: Pedro Castro and Amalia Castro
Defendant: Utah County Sheriff's Department
Case Number: 2:2022cv00464
Filed: July 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jared C Bennett
Referring Judge: Tena Campbell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DOCKET TEXT ORDER TO COMPLY WITH DUCivR 81-2(c). The deadline concerning scheduling set forth in DUCivR 81-2(c) has expired. The parties are hereby ordered to comply with the scheduling requirements of DUCivR 81-2(c) within 14 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 08/29/2022. (docket text order; no attached document) (jcd)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by Plaintiffs Amalia Castro, Pedro Castro, Defendant Utah County Sheriff's Department. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett as presider. Judge Tena Campbell no longer assigned to case. (alf)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Utah County Sheriff's Department. (alf)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability form from Plaintiffs Amalia Castro, Pedro Castro. (alf)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/21/22. (dla)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Utah County Sheriff's Department.(Mylar, Frank)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer to Removed Complaint. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/15/22 (alt)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Utah County Sheriff's Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email Exchange, #2 Exhibit Extension, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint)(Mylar, Frank)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE - Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. The magistrate judge may only preside over this case if all parties voluntarily sign and return the #Consent Form To consent, to have a magistrate judge preside over this case, please complete and return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Amalia Castro, Pedro Castro, Defendant Utah County Sheriff's Department. (Notice generated by Court) Form due by 8/3/2022. (ks)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Amalia Castro, Pedro Castro, Defendant Utah County Sheriff's Department. (ks)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, case number 220400882, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4389364) filed by Utah County Sheriff's Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (Mylar, Frank)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Defendant Utah County Sheriff's Department is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (ks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Castro et al v. Utah County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pedro Castro
Represented By: Norman W. Peat, Jr
Represented By: Donald S. Reay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amalia Castro
Represented By: Norman W. Peat, Jr
Represented By: Donald S. Reay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Utah County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: Frank D. Mylar
Represented By: Andrew R. Hopkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?