Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Roy et al
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
Rachel Roy, Candice Simpkins and Penton, Beau the Estate of |
2:2022cv00485 |
July 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Tena Campbell |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company as to Rachel Roy Waiver sent on 8/8/2022, answer due 10/7/2022. (Moss, Brennan) |
Filing 16 Remark: The deadline for submission of the Magistrate Availability Form has now passed. The form was not filed, therefore the case is ineligible for magistrate presider assignment. The case shall remain with the assigned District Judge. (alf) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF ERROR re #13 Exhibits, #14 Exhibits. The documents were not filed in compliance with DUCivR 10 - also already filed as attachments to the #9 Motion. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to review instructions in email sent today. (alt) |
Filing 14 ERROR: NOT FILED PER DUCivR 10 - EXHIBITS filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company re #8 Amended Complaint,. (Moss, Brennan) Modified on 8/8/2022: exhibit already filed as attachment to #9 Motion (alt) |
Filing 13 ERROR: NOT FILED PER DUCivR 10 - EXHIBITS filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company re #8 Amended Complaint,. (Moss, Brennan) Modified on 8/8/2022: exhibit already filed as attachment to #9 Motion (alt). |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company as to Penton, Beau the Estate of Waiver sent on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Moss, Brennan) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company as to Candice Simpkins Waiver sent on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Moss, Brennan) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Seal Exhibit E and Exhibit G to #8 First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 8/5/22 (alt) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Seal Exhibit E and Exhibit G re #8 Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit E to Amended Complaint - Redacted, #3 Exhibit G to Amended Complaint - Redacted)(Moss, Brennan) Modified on 8/5/2022: removed unnecessary/repetitive text from entry (alt) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT in Interpleader against Penton, Beau the Estate of, Rachel Roy, Candice Simpkins. filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E - SEALED, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G - SEALED) (Moss, Brennan) Modified on 8/5/2022: Exhibits E and G sealed per #10 Order (alt) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah is available to conduct proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. The magistrate judge may preside over this case only after the relevant parties voluntarily sign and return the #Consent Form. To have a magistrate judge preside over this case, please complete and return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not file the Consent Form in the case docket. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. Form due by 8/18/2022. (alf) |
Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Candice Simpkins. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Penton, Beau the Estate of. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Rachel Roy. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company identifying Hartford Holdings, Inc as Corporate Parent. (Moss, Brennan) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4401396) filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (Moss, Brennan) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Plaintiff Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.