Jensen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Kent Jensen |
Federal Bureau of Prisons |
Prisoner Litigation Unit |
2:2022cv00525 |
August 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
David Barlow |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Interdistrict Transfer to Arizona. Record transferred to receiving court electronically. All future documents should be filed in Arizona District Court. Case closed. (mh) |
Filing 3 ORDER Transferring Case- The clerk of the court shall transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 09/16/2022. (mh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabethanne C. Stevens on behalf of Federal Bureau of Prisons (Stevens, Elizabethanne) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal, under 28 U.S.C. 2241 ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 4681099642) Fee Status: Paid. (Originally received on 08/18/2022) filed by Kent Jensen. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Brought under 28 USC 2241, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Envelope) Assigned to Judge David Barlow (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.