Lu v. Northern Utah Healthcare
Plaintiff: Keming Lu
Defendant: Northern Utah Healthcare doing business as St. Mark's Hospital and Utah Supreme Court
Case Number: 2:2022cv00602
Filed: September 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Keming Lu. (alf)
September 27, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Keming Lu as to Northern Utah Healthcare Waiver sent on 9/23/2022, answer due 11/22/2022. (alf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2022: #1 Certificate of Service) (alf).
September 16, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Keming Lu. (mh)
September 15, 2022 Filing 4 EXHIBITS - Appendix B and Appendix C 2 filed by Keming Lu re #1 Complaint. NOTE: The exhibits were received on a USB thumb drive. Exhibits were not entered on the docket due to file type (audio file) and will be retained in a case file folder in the Clerk's Office while the case is active, and according to the retention schedule set forth by the Judicial Conference thereafter. (jwt)
September 15, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return #the form on this link To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not file the Consent Form in the case.Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Keming Lu. Form due by 10/6/2022. (alf)
September 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Northern Utah Healthcare, Utah Supreme Court (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 4681099923) (Fee Status: Paid) filed by Keming Lu. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Appendix C1, #4 Appendix C2, #5 Appendix D, #6 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (mh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lu v. Northern Utah Healthcare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keming Lu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northern Utah Healthcare doing business as St. Mark's Hospital
Represented By: Lisa A. Hogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Utah Supreme Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?