Sait v. Jaddou et al
Plaintiff: Riaz Ahmed Mohammed Sait
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Terri Robinson
Case Number: 2:2022cv00603
Filed: September 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. The court construes #4 DOCUMENT LODGED consisting of an email from Riaz Sait as a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The court accordingly directs the clerk to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 10/21/2022. No document attached. (tf)
October 21, 2022 Civil Case Terminated in light of #4 Docket Text Order. Case closed. Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned to case. (dla)
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 DOCUMENT LODGED consisting of email from Riaz Sait. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (alt)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 9/16/22. (dla)
September 15, 2022 Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Terri Robinson (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 4681099927) (Fee Status: paid) filed by Riaz Ahmed Mohammed Sait. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (nl)
September 15, 2022 Filing 1 STRICKEN, FILED UNDER WRONG EVENT MOTION for Writ of Mandamus Receipt # 4681099927,$402.00. Filed by Petitioner Riaz Ahmed Mohammed Sait, assigned to Judge Nielson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1)(ks) Modified on 9/15/2022 stricken, refiled at dkt #2 under complaint, motion terminated (nl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sait v. Jaddou et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Riaz Ahmed Mohammed Sait
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terri Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?