Kimoto v. Nature's Sunshine Products
Plaintiff: Shari Kimoto
Defendant: Nature's Sunshine Products
Case Number: 2:2022cv00638
Filed: September 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Nature's Sunshine Products. (alf)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Shari Kimoto, Defendant Nature's Sunshine Products. Form due by 12/1/2022. (alf)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Shari Kimoto, Defendant Nature's Sunshine Products. (alf)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Shari Kimoto as to Nature's Sunshine Products Waiver sent on 10/28/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Stavros, Andrew)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Alexander W. Leonard for Shari Kimoto.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 10/18/2022. (alf)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Alexander W. Leonard , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-4476569,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Shari Kimoto. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice Admission of Alexander W. Leonard, #2 Exhibit Pro Hac Vice Application)(Stavros, Andrew)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Alexander W Leonard, for Plaintiff Shari Kimoto. (ks)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 10/3/2022. (alf)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Nature's Sunshine Products (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4462387) filed by Shari Kimoto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (Stavros, Andrew)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Plaintiff Shari Kimoto is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (ks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kimoto v. Nature's Sunshine Products
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shari Kimoto
Represented By: Andrew W. Stavros
Represented By: Alexander W. Leonard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nature's Sunshine Products
Represented By: Gregory M. Saylin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?