Pincast et al v. Thor Motor Coach
Pincast and Paul Southam |
Thor Motor Coach |
2:2022cv00677 |
October 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Daphne A Oberg |
Ted Stewart |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs Pincast, Paul Southam. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reeder, Kyle) |
Civil Case Terminated per #9 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss and chambers. Case closed. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to case. (mh) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 11/29/2022. (gb) |
Filing 7 The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment Forms has now passed. One or more of the parties did not file, therefore the case is ineligible for magistrate assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge Ted Stewart. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned to the case. (alf) |
Filing 6 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return #the form on this link To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not file the Consent Form in the case.Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Pincast, Paul Southam, Defendant Thor Motor Coach. Form due by 11/25/2022. (alf) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Pincast, Paul Southam, Defendant Thor Motor Coach. (nl) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Change Venue and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Thor Motor Coach. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order of Dismissal, #2 Exhibit Purchase Agreement)(Atkinson, Ryan) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff(s) must propose a schedule to Defendant(s) in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report, available on the District of Utahs website at https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-scheduling, within fourteen (14) days. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 10/24/2022. (mh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 4th District, Utah County, case number 220401464, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4482810) filed by Thor Motor Coach. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (Atkinson, Ryan) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Defendant Thor Motor Coach is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (haa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.