Haapaniemi v. Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi and Peter Lee Norris
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Not Classified By Court: Prisoner Litigation Unit
Case Number: 2:2022cv00703
Filed: November 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2022 Civil Case Terminated per #4 Voluntary Dismissal. (dla)
December 5, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi. (jl)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - Plaintiff shall within thirty days file with the court the completed and signed required affidavit (titled, Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, sent with this Order) and certified copy of Plaintiffs inmate trust fund account statement(s). If Plaintiff was held at more than one institution during the past six months, Plaintiff shall file certified trust fund account statements (or institutional equivalent) from the appropriate official at each institution where Plaintiff was confined. The certified trust fund account statement(s) must show deposits and average balances for each month. If Plaintiff does not fully comply, this complaint will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 11/09/2022. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs)(jl)
November 3, 2022 Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of complaint, civil cover sheet, exhibit and envelope. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(haa)
November 3, 2022 Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 11/03/2022) filed by Plaintiff Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi. (haa) Modified on 11/4/2022 (haa).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haapaniemi v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Lee Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Prisoner Litigation Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?