Seastone Products et al v. Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions
Seastone Products and Curt Goddard |
Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions |
2:2022cv00731 |
November 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Dale A Kimball |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Curt Goddard, Seastone Products (Kerr, Jason) |
Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #17 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assigned to case. This action is closed. (eat) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions: answer or other response due by 1/10/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/23/2022. (eat) |
Filing 15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Moon, M.) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions: answer or other response due by 12/27/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/13/2022. (eat) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer To Complaint filed by Defendant Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Moon, M.) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF FILING of Certification on Removal re #2 Notice of Removal, filed by Defendant Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions. (Moon, M.) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiffs must propose a schedule to Defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within twenty-one (21) days after any Defendant has been served or any Defendant has appeared, unless any party is appearing pro se. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/30/2022. (eat) |
Filing 10 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(a) and Local Rule of Practice DUCivR 81-2, the removing party must certify that a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served or entered in the state court action have been filed in this case. The certification must be filed by December 9, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/30/2022. |
Filing 9 CLERK'S ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions: answer or other response due by 12/13/2022. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Tiffany Brown. (eat) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert D. Vogel on behalf of Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions (Vogel, Robert) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions. (Moon, M.) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Moon, M.) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 11/23/2022. (eat) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Curt Goddard, Seastone Products, Defendant Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions. (ks) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah is available to conduct proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. The magistrate judge may preside over this case only after the relevant parties voluntarily sign and return the Consent Form. To have a magistrate judge preside over this case, please complete and return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case docket. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Curt Goddard, Seastone Products. (Notice generated by Court) Form due by 12/14/2022. (ks) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Third District Court Salt Lake County, case number 220906592, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 4436278) filed by Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Complaint for Declaratory Relief, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C Acceptance of Service for Summons and Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball (Moon, M.) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball. Defendant Westrock Company and Multi Packaging Solutions is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.