Integrated Business Planning Associates v. Operational Results
Integrated Business Planning Associates |
Operational Results |
2:2022cv00733 |
November 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Jill N Parrish |
Cecilia M Romero |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Plaintiff's MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Integrated Business Planning Associates. (Showel, Matthew) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION of Protocol for Production of Electronically Stored Information by Integrated Business Planning Associates. (Showel, Matthew) |
Filing 15 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Showel, Matthew) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. The case is randomly reassigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish as the presiding judge and automatically referred to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero is no longer assigned as the presiding judge.(alf) |
Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Operational Results. (Lindley, Zachary) |
Filing 12 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Operational Results. (mh) |
Filing 11 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Integrated Business Planning Associates. (alf) |
Filing 10 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Integrated Business Planning Associates, Defendant Operational Results. Form due by 1/20/2023. (alf) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Integrated Business Planning Associates, Defendant Operational Results. (alf) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Integrated Business Planning Associates filed by Operational Results. Attorney Rod N. Andreason added to party Operational Results (pty:dft)(Andreason, Rod) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Matthew M. Showell for Integrated Business Planning Associates.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/5/2022. (alf) |
Filing 6 Plaintiff's MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Matthew M. Showel , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-4520695,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Integrated Business Planning Associates. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pro Hac Vice Application, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Matthew M. Showel)(Swensen, Lara) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Operational Results. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 11/28/2022. (alf) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Integrated Business Planning Associates. (Swensen, Lara) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Darrin S Baim, Matthew M. Showel, for Plaintiff Integrated Business Planning Associates (ks) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Operational Results, INC. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4513675) filed by Integrated Business Planning Associates, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - 1, #2 Exhibit - 2, #3 Exhibit - 3, #4 Exhibit - 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Stephens, Mitchell) |
Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero added. Case number will now read 2:22-CV-00733-CMR. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Integrated Business Planning Associates v. Operational Results | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Integrated Business Planning Associates | |
Represented By: | Lara A. Swensen |
Represented By: | Matthew M. Showel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Operational Results | |
Represented By: | Zachary Clyde Lindley |
Represented By: | Rod N. Andreason |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.