Garvin v. USCIS Salt Lake City Field Office, et al
| James Dee Garvin |
| uscis salt lake city field office and Michael Crabtree |
| 2:2022cv00748 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/2/2023. (mh)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all non-dispositive pretrial matters. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 2/1/2023. (cfm)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by James Cottrell Graulich, III on behalf of Michael Crabtree, USCIS Salt Lake City Field Office (Graulich, James) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah is available to conduct proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. The magistrate judge may preside over this case only after the relevant parties voluntarily sign and return the Consent Form. To have a magistrate judge preside over this case, please complete and return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case docket. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff James Dee Garvin. Form due by 12/29/2022. (alf) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Michael Crabtree. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Attorney General of the United States. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to USCIS Salt Lake City Field Office. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to United States Attorney's Office for the District of Utah. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
| Judge David Barlow added. Case number will now read 2:22-CV-00748-DBB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (ks) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet (JS44) re #1 Complaint, Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance, filed by James Dee Garvin. (Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4522364) filed by James Dee Garvin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit) (Chen, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
