LeCheminant v. Thanksgiving Point Institute et al
| Annelise LeCheminant |
| Thanksgiving Point Institute, Inc., David James Stroud, Blake Ryan Wigdahl and Thanksgiving Point Institute |
| 2:2022cv00774 |
| December 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Complaint. Defendants may have until February 27, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 2/1/2023. (eat)
|
| Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Annelise LeCheminant. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Nadesan, Karthik) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 12/20/2022. (eat)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah is available to conduct proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. The magistrate judge may preside over this case only after the relevant parties voluntarily sign and return the Consent Form. To have a magistrate judge preside over this case, please complete and return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case docket. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Annelise LeCheminant. Form due by 1/6/2023. (alf) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 12/15/2022. (eat)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to David James Stroud. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Blake Ryan Wigdahl. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Thanksgiving Point Institute. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (nl) |
| Filing 2 Case Assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball. Case number will now read 2:22-cv-00774-DAK. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (nl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4530056) filed by Annelise LeCheminant. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Certificate of Copyright Registration, #2 Exhibit 2: Photographs of Use, #3 Exhibit 3: Video of Use, #4 Civil Cover Sheet ) (Nadesan, Karthik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
