Erickson v. Line Construction Benefit Fund
| Kristoffer Erickson |
| Line Construction Benefit Fund and Lineco |
| 2:2022cv00809 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362 ERISA |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah is available to conduct proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. The magistrate judge may preside over this case only after the relevant parties voluntarily sign and return the Consent Form. To have a magistrate judge preside over this case, please complete and return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case docket. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Kristoffer Erickson. Form due by 2/13/2023. (alf) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 1/4/23. (dla)
|
|
Filing 6
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 1/3/23. (dla)
|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Line Construction Benefit Fund (Originally received by the court on 12/27/2022). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Kristoffer Erickson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (haa) |
|
Filing 4
DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis. (See Doc. No. 3.) Accordingly, the court will "issue and serve all process." 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). If Plaintiff intends to have the court effectuate service, Plaintiff or counsel must complete and return to the Clerk's Office a summons and Service of Process form for each defendant, see DUCivR 3-2(c)(2)(A)(i), available on the courts website: https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/usdc-forms by January 14, 2022. If Plaintiff elects to pursue service without court assistance, Plaintiff must properly serve the defendant(s) or move for an extension within 90 days from the date the complaint was filed, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/30/2022.(amn) Modified on 1/3/2023 to add docket clerk initials (nl).
|
|
Filing 3
DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Having considered Plaintiff's Motion under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e) the Court GRANTS the Motion #1 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/30/2022.(amn) Modified on 1/3/2023 to add docket clerk initials(nl).
|
| Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, and Civil Cover Sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ks) |
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B Pead for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 12/27/2022) filed by Plaintiff Kristoffer Erickson. (Attachments: #1 November IFP Motion)(ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
